"A critic's job is to be interesting about why he or she likes or dislikes something." Sir Peter Hall. This is what I aspire to achieve here.
Showing posts with label charlize theron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label charlize theron. Show all posts
Friday, May 15, 2015
Film Review: Mad Max: Fury Road
Mad Max: Fury Road. Rated MA15+ (strong violence and post-apocalyptic themes). 120 minutes. Directed by George Miller. Screenplay by George Miller, Brendan McCarthy and Nick Lathouris.
Verdict: A masterpiece.
It’s been thirty years since we last spent time in the company of George Miller’s ‘Mad’ Max Rockatansky (Mel Gibson). It was 1985’s Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome. Before that was 1981’s Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior, and the ground-breaking movie that started it all, 1979’s Mad Max.
So how do you prepare to experience a film that has been thirty years in the making? After the epic disappointment (in similar circumstances) that was Ridley Scott’s Prometheus, there is always a danger that a keenly anticipated film might not have a chance of being as good as we want, or even need, it to be.
Fear not, because Mad Max: Fury Road is, in a word, magnificent. It is, in fact, beyond magnificent. It is a film of such complete, jaw-dropping cinematic mastery in every way that after the first astonishing twenty minutes, you will find yourself wondering where on earth Miller (Happy Feet 1 and 2, Lorenzo's Oil, The Witches of Eastwick) and his superb collaborators have left to go. The answer is, miraculously, everywhere and back again.
The screenplay is all fascinating, lean, cinematic muscle – creating a world where actions speak much louder than words and manage to say a good deal more. Photographed from every impossible angle by veteran cinematographer John Seale, scored majestically by Junkie XL, and edited to breathtaking perfection by Margaret Sixel and Jason Ballantine, Fury Road also boasts visionary work from costume designer Jenny Beavan and production designer Colin Gibson.
The performances from Miller’s outstanding cast are exceptional, but the stand-out is Charlize Theron. In a performance of immense emotional range, it is Theron’s Furiosa who matches the cars, trucks, weaponry, pageantry and gob-smacking stunt work, blowout-for-blowout.
This review was commissioned by the West Australian Newspaper Group.
Sunday, June 8, 2014
Film Review: A Million Ways to Die in the West
A Million Ways to
Die in the West. Rated MA15+ (strong sexual references, crude humour and
comedic violence). 116 minutes. Directed by Seth MacFarlane. Written by Seth
MacFarlane, Alec Sulkin and Wellesley Wild.
Verdict: Seth
MacFarlane rides again.
A Million Ways to
Die in the West, like many of Hollywood’s recent attempts at comedy, is largely
a hit and miss affair. Albert (MacFarlane) is a well-meaning, sheep farmer on
the fringes of Old Stump, whose aspirational girlfriend Louise (Amanda Seyfried)
dumps him for the town’s rich and pompous moustachier Foy (Neil Patrick Harris).
When he meets Anna (Charlize Theron), the wife of the abusive, murderous outlaw
Clinch Leatherwood (Liam Neeson), Albert accepts Anna’s offer to help him win
back the girl of his dreams.
Best known as the
voice of Family Guy’s Peter, Brian and Stewie Griffin, A Million Ways to Die in
the West is MacFarlane’s debut in front of the camera (he also produces and
directs). And while there is no doubting the appeal of his self-deprecating
charm and charisma as a performer, his humour has always been an acquired
taste. Ted (2012), which MacFarlane voiced, wrote and directed, went on to
become the most commercially successful R-rated comedy in the history of
cinema. So it is hardly surprising that he should be given another opportunity
to rake in the big box office bucks.
As we have come to
expect, there are spectacular examples of bad taste and smut, and the
easily-offended advocates of political correctness will be apoplectic with rage
in no time at all. Cinematographer Michael Barrett (Ted, Zookeeper) photographs
it all beautifully, which helps enormously, and Joel McNeely’s lavish score is
great to experience in the cinema.
It’s just a real
shame that the endless array of jokes are so cheap, and that the moments of
genuine wit and cleverness are so limited.
This review was
commissioned by the West Australian Newspaper Group.
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Film Review: Snow White and the Huntsman
Snow White and the
Huntsman. Rated M (fantasy
themes and violence). 127
minutes. Directed by Rupert Sanders. Screenplay by Evan Daugherty, John Lee Hancock and Hossein
Amini.
Verdict: The long and winding road that leads to a palace.
While it is certainly a
stunning film to look at, Snow White and the Huntsman takes too many detours and far too much time to
wend its way through what is a very familiar story of a princess feted to rise
up against a murderous Queen and regain the throne she was ruthlessly denied.
Similarly to Tarsem Singh’s
gorgeous looking Snow White-lite take earlier this year (Mirror, Mirror) Sanders’ equally-sumptuous affair boasts Dominic
Watkins’ (The Bourne Supremacy,
United 93) extravagant
production design and Colleen Atwood’s (Alice in Wonderland, Memoirs of a Geisha) picture-perfect costumes. Melbourne-born Greig
Fraser (Caterpillar Wish, Bright
Star, Let Me In) cements his international reputation with
outstanding cinematography that captures every essence of the film’s many
challenging and constantly changing moods and locations.
The writers and Sanders,
making his feature film debut, make what turns out to be a near-fatal error by
mistaking ‘long’ for ‘epic’. What they risk in the process is undermining the
film’s many great qualities, which other than in the design departments and
some inventive sequences (especially the scenes set at the lakeside commune
where the once-beautiful women have fled from the evil queen’s life-draining
hunger for their beauty), are the spirited performances and a flawless visual
tapestry of creative splendour.
Chris Hemsworth (Thor) does his best work to date as the grieving
Huntsman, while Charlize Theron (Prometheus, Monster) goes for broke from start to finish and never misses a trick. Kristen
Stewart (Twilight’s Bella)
flexes her acting muscles in ways that have not been required of her in the Twilight franchise, and the fact that we never really care
about her fate is the fault of the wandering and didactic screenplay – not her
spirited charge through the leading role.
The actors who play the
dwarfs (including Bob Hoskins, Ray Winstone and Nick Frost) have been digitally
manipulated to the size of a dwarf which works for a moment – before you begin
to realise that the film is almost beginning to sink with too much trickery at
the expense of being something we might have actually been a good deal more
engaged by. Apparently, and there’s no prizes, there’s going to be a sequel.
Please let it be over in half the time. If that.
This review was commissioned by the Geraldton Newspaper Group.
This review was commissioned by the Geraldton Newspaper Group.
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Film Review: Prometheus
Prometheus. Rated M (moderate science fiction violence and a medical procedure). 124 minutes. Directed by Ridley Scott. Screenplay by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof.
Verdict: An abysmal script sinks any hope of the
masterpiece we might have expected.
With the exception of The Avengers, it is difficult to
imagine a film that has been so keenly anticipated as Ridley Scott’s Alien prequel Prometheus. For months, pre-release expectations have been
whipped up into a frenzy with leaked clips, photos and gossip – all of which
risked doing the film a great disservice. Could Prometheus be anywhere near as fantastic as we had been
manipulated into believing it might be?
It is 2089. Archaeologists
Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green)
discover an ancient star map that they interpret as an invitation for contact
from a pre-human race of supreme beings. Three years later, at the invitation
of the ageing Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce), Shaw and Holloway join the crew of
the scientific exploration vessel Prometheus to travel to the distant moon LV-223
where their creationist theories will be challenged beyond their comprehension.
Spaihts and Lindelof’s
(TV’s Lost, and 2011’s turkey Cowboys & Aliens) screenplay boasts a
hapless mediocrity – and if there is a sci-fi cliché or another superior
movie’s highpoint to be exploited, they waste no time in doing so. The abysmal
script is only made worse when compared to the exceptional work of production
designer Arthur Max (Robin Hood,
Black Hawk Down, Gladiator, Se7en)
and cinematographer Dariusz Wolski (the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, Alice in Wonderland, Dark City).
The cast, which includes
Charlize Theron as corporate whip Meredith Vickers, Michael Fassbender as David
the Android, and Idris Elba as the captain of the Prometheus, all do their very
best to keep a straight face – possibly realising that at least they’ll
certainly look great. Ms Rapace and Mr Marshall-Green both bring real chemistry
to their roles, with Rapace in particular, effortlessly rising to the silly
demands required of her in the film’s panic-stricken second half.
Shot – spectacularly – in
3D, Mr Scott has certainly made an ambitious return to the universe he so
lovingly crafted for Alien in
1979. What is even more extraordinary is why he went there with a script that
never manages to stand up to the grand themes of the origins of humanity he
obviously wants to explore. And if the heavily sign-posted sequel eventuates (Alien aficionados will know that the crew of the Nostromo
discovered a derelict spaceship on LV-426, not Prometheus’s LV-223), we can only hope he goes there with new
writers.
Pictured: Logan Marshall-Green, Noomi Rapace and Michael Fassbender quite possibly dreading their next line of dialogue in Prometheus.
This review was commissioned by the Geraldton Newspaper Group.
Pictured: Logan Marshall-Green, Noomi Rapace and Michael Fassbender quite possibly dreading their next line of dialogue in Prometheus.
This review was commissioned by the Geraldton Newspaper Group.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)